Delimitation

  • History:
    • 42nd CAA 1976: froze till 2000 at 1971 level
    • 84th CAA 2001: froze till 2026 and allowed readjustment based on 1991 census
    • 87th CAA 2003: delimitation based on 2001 census w/o altering seat allocation
  • high powered body: Delimitation Commission
    • constituted: 1952, 1963, 1973, 2002
  • Art 82/170: delimitation of parl/assembly constituency
    • in such authority and manner as the parliament may, by law, determine
  • Art 330/332: refixing seats for SC/ST in LS & SLA

Can Delimitation be challenged?

  • no modification permissible by House of People & SLA
  • comes into effect on a date specified by the president of india
  • however: SC: constitutional courts have power to review orders of delimitation commission if an order is arbitrary & irreconciliable constitutional values (Kishor Chandra Chhanganlal Rathod vs UoI 2024)
    • Meghraj Kothari vs Delimitation Commission & others 1996: Judicial interference restricted only to avoid unnecessary delay in election process; not an absolute bar on constitutional courts powers to review orders of delimitation commission

Significance of Delimitation

  • constitutional mandate for fair representation of demographic realities
  • political equality - one person one vote
  • preventing gerrymandering
  • federalism
  • historial adjustment for balanced representation relative to population distribution

Issues

  • federal imbalance: if based only on population, benefits high growth states and punishes states that have controlled population
  • reserved constituencies do not accurately reflect demographic realities of SC/ST communities
  • lack of public participation in delimitation
  • delays in conducting census and thus, delimitation

Way forward

  • use TFR for seat allocation
  • greater public engagement, involve stakeholders
  • mandate periodic review (eg. after each census)
  • better redrawing of constituencies to reflect local cultural / community unity

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988

Section 17A of POCA

  • mandates there should be prior sanction from govt to launch investigation against public service

Corruption: acceptance or solicitation of gratification by public servant for peforming or not performing an official act

Why corruption prevails in india

  • centralized control (state control, licence raj, bureaucratic regulation)
    • eg. Bofors scandal
  • political bureaucratic nexus: foster patronage, nepotism, protection of corrupt networks eg. Adarsh Housing Scam 2010
  • Socio economic disparities: poverty & economic distress increase vulnerability to bribery and exploitation
  • Sanskritization of Corruption (Prof. Kaushik Basu, former chief economic Advisor to GoI)
    • corrupt behaviour displayed to gain respect & social prestige and normalized as a way for upward mobility
  • lack of independent investigative agency eg. CBI function under executive control
  • overburdened judicial system - delays in prosecution
  • lack of transparency in administration & weak whistleblower protection, poor public oversight

Other steps to fight corruption

  • Fugitive Economic Offenders Act 2018: benami txn, corpo fraud, evasion of income tax, PMLA
  • Whistle Blower Protection Act 2014
  • Lokpal & Lokayukta Act 2013: includes PM
  • UNCAC: ratified by india in 2011
  • RTI 2005