Delimitation
- History:
- 42nd CAA 1976: froze till 2000 at 1971 level
- 84th CAA 2001: froze till 2026 and allowed readjustment based on 1991 census
- 87th CAA 2003: delimitation based on 2001 census w/o altering seat allocation
- high powered body: Delimitation Commission
- constituted: 1952, 1963, 1973, 2002
- Art 82/170: delimitation of parl/assembly constituency
- in such authority and manner as the parliament may, by law, determine
- Art 330/332: refixing seats for SC/ST in LS & SLA
Can Delimitation be challenged?
- no modification permissible by House of People & SLA
- comes into effect on a date specified by the president of india
- however: SC: constitutional courts have power to review orders of delimitation commission if an order is arbitrary & irreconciliable constitutional values (Kishor Chandra Chhanganlal Rathod vs UoI 2024)
- Meghraj Kothari vs Delimitation Commission & others 1996: Judicial interference restricted only to avoid unnecessary delay in election process; not an absolute bar on constitutional courts powers to review orders of delimitation commission
Significance of Delimitation
- constitutional mandate for fair representation of demographic realities
- political equality - one person one vote
- preventing gerrymandering
- federalism
- historial adjustment for balanced representation relative to population distribution
Issues
- federal imbalance: if based only on population, benefits high growth states and punishes states that have controlled population
- reserved constituencies do not accurately reflect demographic realities of SC/ST communities
- lack of public participation in delimitation
- delays in conducting census and thus, delimitation
Way forward
- use TFR for seat allocation
- greater public engagement, involve stakeholders
- mandate periodic review (eg. after each census)
- better redrawing of constituencies to reflect local cultural / community unity
Prevention of Corruption Act 1988
Section 17A of POCA
- mandates there should be prior sanction from govt to launch investigation against public service
Corruption: acceptance or solicitation of gratification by public servant for peforming or not performing an official act
Why corruption prevails in india
- centralized control (state control, licence raj, bureaucratic regulation)
- eg. Bofors scandal
- political bureaucratic nexus: foster patronage, nepotism, protection of corrupt networks eg. Adarsh Housing Scam 2010
- Socio economic disparities: poverty & economic distress increase vulnerability to bribery and exploitation
- Sanskritization of Corruption (Prof. Kaushik Basu, former chief economic Advisor to GoI)
- corrupt behaviour displayed to gain respect & social prestige and normalized as a way for upward mobility
- lack of independent investigative agency eg. CBI function under executive control
- overburdened judicial system - delays in prosecution
- lack of transparency in administration & weak whistleblower protection, poor public oversight
Other steps to fight corruption
- Fugitive Economic Offenders Act 2018: benami txn, corpo fraud, evasion of income tax, PMLA
- Whistle Blower Protection Act 2014
- Lokpal & Lokayukta Act 2013: includes PM
- UNCAC: ratified by india in 2011
- RTI 2005