16th Finance Commission
- constituted by PRe every 5 years Art 280
- term: specified by prez
- reappointment: YES
- Composition: chairman + 4 members
- report submitted to president
- recommendations advisory
What all covered?
- vertical devolution of net union tax proceeds (divisible pool)
- horizontal interstate distribution
- grant in aid
- local bodies funds
- any other financial matter referred by the President
Resource sharing
3 main channels to flow money from union to states
- Divisible Pool
- Art 270(1): union tax revenue excl. cess, surcharge, UT tax, cost of collection are to be shared with states based on FC recc
- Grant in aid Article 275(1)
- Discretionary Grants Art 282 (mainly thru centrally sponsored schemes)
Limitations of FC
- data gap (old data, unreliable, incomplete, outdated, inconsistent)
- political pressure to align with government vision
- GST Council overlap (tax decisions by GST council affect FC divisible pool)
- question of centralization & federalism
- limited control over third tier of government
- non binding
Recommendation of 16th Finance Commission
for the 5 year period b/w 2026-31
Key Recommendations
- 41% vertical devolution (same as earlier)
- changed criteria for horizontal devolution
- income distance (based on per capita GSDP)
- population 2011 census
- demograpic prformance (population growth from 1971 to 2011)
- replaced TFR metric of 15th FC
- Forest: total forest + increase in 2015-23
- contribution to GDP
- replacing “tax efforts”
Grant in Aid
- only 2 grant in aid suggested:
- Rural/urban local body grants
- disaster management grants
- total grant 9.47 Lakh Crore
- other grants discontinued: revenue deficit, sector specific, state specific
Local Body Grants
- 45% grant (earlier 36%) for urban local body
- 50% grant tied to sanitation, waste management, water mgmt
- Special ULB grants for wastewater management infrastructure
- Urbanization Premium: one time grant for merging peri urban villages and formulating rural to urban transition policy
Disaster Management Grants
- corpus: 2 lakh crore for SDRF & SDMF
- cost sharing: 90:10 for NE/Himalayan; 75:25 otherwise
- New disasters: heatwave, lightning recommended
- NDMIS to be upgraded
Four reforms for sound public finance
- prudent fiscal management
- center: reduce fiscal deficit to 3.5% of GDP by 2030-31
- states: cap fiscal deficit at 3% of GSDP
- power sector: actively privatize electricity DISCOMS
- Subsidy rationalization
- retain only those schemes which effectively target the poor
- PSE reforms
- review & close 308 inactive state PSE
- formulate state level disinvestment policy
Urbanization in India
Issues with Indian Urbanization
- Urban Paradox: Economic Survey 2026 - population scale has not resulted in proportional global economic influence or libeability because infra investment has lagged behind growth
- potential benefits of density are diluted by congestion, economic stress, informalization
- expansion of existing cities into nearby towns causing divergence with official policy understanding
- poor urban mobility, focusing on vehicles over people
- poor waste and cleanliness standards
- artificial land scarcity due to low floor space index (FSI) norms
- informality in indian cities - slums, informal labour, unregistered enterprises
- fragmentede governangce
- weak mayoral authority
- ULB financially dependent on state
Measures to improve urbanization
- infra led growth
- improve mobility, public transportation
- eg. Namo Bharat RRTS
- integration of informality: design public spaces to incorporate the informal economy eg. streets designed to have space for formal vending
- establish unified authority for metropolitan governance
- unconditional transfer of funds, functions and functionaries (3F) as per 74th Amendment
- implement self updating property taxes, user charges, and access capital market (municipal bonds) for fiscal autonomy
- create specialized municipal cadres
- urban design should act as behavioural instrument - legible streets with clear marking, signage, segregated lanes etc to reduce ambiguity
- citizens are more willing to comply when they see tangible returns on their taxes through improved services
- Nature based solutions eg. mandate rainwater harvesting