Carbon Capture, Utilization & Storage (CCUS)

Union budget allocated Rs.20,000Cr over next 5 years to support development and deployment of CCUS

What is CCUS

IEA defines CCUS as tech that captures form large stationary sources like power plants and industries.

Capture techniques:

  • direct air caputre
  • solvents (chem/phy)
  • adsorption
  • cryogenic separation

Storage:

  • trapped in geological storage incl. Enhanced oil Recovery, Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Recovery
  • permanent storage - saline aquifer, basalt storage

Significance of CCUS for India

  • decarbonization of hard to abate sectors
    • only known tech for decarbonizing steel, cement, oil & gas, chemical, fertilizer industry
  • enabling sunrise sectors to be cost competitive production of blue hydrogen
  • CCUS enables circular carbon economy
    • allows value added products through usage of captured carbon
  • sustenance of existing emitters by retrofitting
  • achieving net ero emissions targets
  • as 3rd largest emitter of CO2, CCUS imp

Challenges with CCUS

  • high cost $100-150B for 750mtpa of CO2
  • tech limitations
    • CO2 utilization tech less developed
    • DAC in early stage & expensive
  • difficult to retrofit existing plants
  • geological storage risk - fracture rock, induce microearthquake
  • regulatory hurdles
  • limited data on success of storage of CO2

Way forward for CCUS

  • incentivize & derisk CCUS projects to enhance pvt participation
  • support low carbon & carbon abated products through preference in public procurement
  • targeted policy intervention eg. Carbon Capture Finance Corporation
  • promote R&D in novel CO2 utilization tech
  • tech transfer from other nations
  • mapping storage sites
  • hub & cluster model eg. in KG Basin
  • Machine learning for Geological data analysis

Transmission Bottleneck

  • Temporary General Network Access: provides short term access to interstate transmission system
  • India producing lot of energy, incl. clean sources, but weak transmission infra causes losses, curtailment of power generations

Solar Energy

Floating Solar Photovoltaic project

  • under PM Surya Sarovar Yojna, outlay of Rs.5070Cr
  • goal to deploy 5000MW of FSPV w/ 10,000MWh of BEES
  • current estimated india’s floating solar potential:
    • 102GW (at 20% surface area utilization)
  • current operational floating solar capacity: 700MW
    • Omkareshwar Floating Solar Park, MP (278MW operational out of 600MW)
  • advantage
    • land conservation, no land acquisition litigation, avoid agri land diversion
    • preserve freshwater reserves
    • colocation with HEP dams
    • inhibition of algal blooms
  • challenge
    • high capital & anchorist cost (15% more than ground mounted plants)
    • drastic seasonal change in reservoir water level
    • ecological & biodiversity concerns
    • corrosion, moisture degradation
    • multi agency regulatory bottleneck

Geothermal Energy

  • National Policy on Geothermal Energy 2025
  • GSI: india’s geothermal potential at 10.6GW
  • Major geothermal provinces
    • SONATA (Son-Narmada-Tapi)
    • Godavari basin
    • Aravalli
    • Ladakh - himachal
    • Andaman volcanic arc
  • Puga Valley project: high altitude, in Ladakh’s Changthang region
    • Two 1000 metre wells
    • india’s maiden 1MW demonstration scale geothermal power plant
LocationOrgStatus
Puga Valley, LadakhONGC, Ladakh Admin, LAHDC2x 1000M deep production wells commissioned
Ankleshwar, GujaratMNRE Pilot project w/ Oil & Gas PSUretrofitting abandoned or depleted oil & gas wells for geothermal poer
Gandhinagar, GujaratIntegrated solar, geothermal
Tawang, ArunachalHigh altitude geothermal resource assessment

Geothermal advantages

  • round the clock clean baseload
    • unlike weather dependent wind / solar, geothermal can operate at high capacity utilization
  • decarbonizing fragile border regions
  • direct multi sector applications
    • greenhouse farming
    • district space heating
    • agro processing
    • geo tourism
  • critical mineral extraction from geothermal brines
    • Lithium, Rubidium, Boron

Challenges

  • high upfront exploration risk
  • high altitude logistical issues, sub zero temp, narrow mountain passes
  • corrosion & mineral scaling due to geothermal fluids
  • environment & induced seismicity concerns
  • absence of mature indigenous supply chain in geothermal tech

Way forward

  • derisk private capital via VGF
  • fast track multilateral knowledge partnerships eg. with Iceland, Australia, Saudi
  • Synergize Hydrocarbon data with geothermal mapping
    • to reduce survey costs
  • standardize district direct use infra
  • enforce closed loop reinjection standards

Conclusion: net zero 2070 goal, 500GW non fossil fuel target