Major Committees
| Year | Committee | Recommendation |
|---|
| 1957 | Balwant Rai Mehta | 3 tier Panchayati Raj |
| 1978 | Ashok Mehta | 2 tier system |
| | Zila Parishad & Mandal Panchayat |
| 1985 | GVK Rao | strengthen planning & admin role of PRI |
| 1986 | LM Singhvi | constitutional status for PRI |
| 2001 | HK Patil | greater devolution to local bodies |
| 2007 | 2nd ARC | emphasized decentralization & role clarity b/w tiers |
Functions of LSG
- common: basic amenities (water, sanitation), health, edu, welfare scheme, road, disaster relief
- Art 243G (PRI): rural development, agri, social justice (eg. nyaya panchayat)
- Art 243W (Municipals): urban planning, housing, slum improvement, transport, trade regulation
Role of local bodies in good governance
- decentralized decision making
- community engagement eg. Kerala participatory budgeting
- inclusion of marginalized sections eg. 45% PRI women members
- resource management, service delivery
Empowering PRI - govt efforts
- SVAMITVA scheme - drone based rural property record preparation
- Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan - capacity building of PRI
- e-Gram Swaraj
- Gram Panchayat Development Plan
- Panchayat Sashaktikaran Abhiyan - training & capacity building
Challenges
| Challenge area | Issues |
|---|
| Funds | inadequate funds, dependency on state devolution |
| weak local revenue generation |
| reluctance to tax locals |
| delays in constituting SFC |
| 15th FC: no grants w/o SFC compliance |
| Functions | Poor devolution of powers |
| state retains key functions |
| weak district planning committees |
| parallel bodies eg. SPV (Smart cities mission) |
| Functionaries | inadequate staff |
| deputed personnel lack accountability |
| weak audit & transparency |
| delayed elections |
| political interference, politicization |
Should rural & local bodies be merged?
| Pros | Cons |
|---|
| Integrated development | rural priorities sidelined |
| cost efficiency | political representation imbalance |
| equitable resource allocation | funds may favor urban areas |
| efficient service delivery | regulatory complexities |
| different kinds of challenges |
Women in PRI
- 46% rep
- focus on welfare, governance, political aspiration
- +ve leadership: Chhavi Rajawat, Suranlekha
- challenges: proxy leadership, patriarchal norms, low national representation
Curbing proxy representation
- penalizing proxies
- Sashakt Panchayat Netri Abhiyan for promoting genuine leadership
Urban Local Bodies
Recent Initiatives
- Annual Capacity Building Plan: strengthen ULB capacity, piloted in Ahmedabad, Mysuru, Rajkot, Pune
- Municipal corporation role: govern urban infra, sanitation, water, health
- but revenue only 0.6% of GDP (RBI 2023-24)
Impact of local self governance
- decentralization of power eg. Ward Committees
- Effective service delivery
- grassroots development eg. DPC
- Marginaziled empowerment
Reluctance of states to empower ULB
- limited autonomy, manpower shortage, bypassing via SPV
- finance: dependnce on grants, weak SFC, restricted tax powers, limited market access
Municipals
| Issue | Solution |
|---|
| Less functional autonomy | transfer functions, funds, functionaries |
| Low revenue generation | strengthen property tax collection |
| concentration of power | decentralize within ULB |
| poor citizen link | activate ward committee & tech usage |
| lack of economic integration | city economic councils for business facilitation |
| Weak financial systems | fiscal decentralization & market oriented models |
| untimely elections | ensure timely elections as per SC directives |
Capacity building measures
- National Urban Digital Mission
- JNNURM
- Municipal bonds: Rs.2600Cr raised post 2018
Impact of decentralization on Grassroots governance
- strengthened local insti: PRI, ULB empowered
- enhanced participation, boosts inclusivitiy
- better scheme implementation
- quick issue resolution, localized solutions eg. Zero Waste, Alappuzha
- economic upliftment (SHG, Rural livelihood, eg. Kudambashree)
Persistent challenges
- financial dependence
- social & gender barriers
- political interference
- capacity gaps
- weak accountability mechanism