Major Committees

YearCommitteeRecommendation
1957Balwant Rai Mehta3 tier Panchayati Raj
1978Ashok Mehta2 tier system
Zila Parishad & Mandal Panchayat
1985GVK Raostrengthen planning & admin role of PRI
1986LM Singhviconstitutional status for PRI
2001HK Patilgreater devolution to local bodies
20072nd ARCemphasized decentralization & role clarity b/w tiers

Functions of LSG

  • common: basic amenities (water, sanitation), health, edu, welfare scheme, road, disaster relief
  • Art 243G (PRI): rural development, agri, social justice (eg. nyaya panchayat)
  • Art 243W (Municipals): urban planning, housing, slum improvement, transport, trade regulation

Role of local bodies in good governance

  • decentralized decision making
  • community engagement eg. Kerala participatory budgeting
  • inclusion of marginalized sections eg. 45% PRI women members
  • resource management, service delivery

Empowering PRI - govt efforts

  • SVAMITVA scheme - drone based rural property record preparation
  • Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan - capacity building of PRI
  • e-Gram Swaraj
  • Gram Panchayat Development Plan
  • Panchayat Sashaktikaran Abhiyan - training & capacity building

Challenges

Challenge areaIssues
Fundsinadequate funds, dependency on state devolution
weak local revenue generation
reluctance to tax locals
delays in constituting SFC
15th FC: no grants w/o SFC compliance
FunctionsPoor devolution of powers
state retains key functions
weak district planning committees
parallel bodies eg. SPV (Smart cities mission)
Functionariesinadequate staff
deputed personnel lack accountability
weak audit & transparency
delayed elections
political interference, politicization

Should rural & local bodies be merged?

ProsCons
Integrated developmentrural priorities sidelined
cost efficiencypolitical representation imbalance
equitable resource allocationfunds may favor urban areas
efficient service deliveryregulatory complexities
different kinds of challenges

Women in PRI

  • 46% rep
  • focus on welfare, governance, political aspiration
  • +ve leadership: Chhavi Rajawat, Suranlekha
  • challenges: proxy leadership, patriarchal norms, low national representation

Curbing proxy representation

  • penalizing proxies
  • Sashakt Panchayat Netri Abhiyan for promoting genuine leadership

Urban Local Bodies

Recent Initiatives

  • Annual Capacity Building Plan: strengthen ULB capacity, piloted in Ahmedabad, Mysuru, Rajkot, Pune
  • Municipal corporation role: govern urban infra, sanitation, water, health
    • but revenue only 0.6% of GDP (RBI 2023-24)

Impact of local self governance

  • decentralization of power eg. Ward Committees
  • Effective service delivery
  • grassroots development eg. DPC
  • Marginaziled empowerment

Reluctance of states to empower ULB

  • limited autonomy, manpower shortage, bypassing via SPV
  • finance: dependnce on grants, weak SFC, restricted tax powers, limited market access

Municipals

IssueSolution
Less functional autonomytransfer functions, funds, functionaries
Low revenue generationstrengthen property tax collection
concentration of powerdecentralize within ULB
poor citizen linkactivate ward committee & tech usage
lack of economic integrationcity economic councils for business facilitation
Weak financial systemsfiscal decentralization & market oriented models
untimely electionsensure timely elections as per SC directives

Capacity building measures

  • National Urban Digital Mission
  • JNNURM
  • Municipal bonds: Rs.2600Cr raised post 2018

Impact of decentralization on Grassroots governance

  • strengthened local insti: PRI, ULB empowered
  • enhanced participation, boosts inclusivitiy
  • better scheme implementation
  • quick issue resolution, localized solutions eg. Zero Waste, Alappuzha
  • economic upliftment (SHG, Rural livelihood, eg. Kudambashree)

Persistent challenges

  • financial dependence
  • social & gender barriers
  • political interference
  • capacity gaps
  • weak accountability mechanism